Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Rick Santorum: John McCain Doesn't Understand..

By JUANA SUMMERS 5/17/11 2:24 PM EDT Updated: 5/17/11 4:07 PM EDT

Rick Santorum said Tuesday that Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who was tortured as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, "doesn't understand how enhanced interrogation works."

Speaking on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show, Santorum, the presidential hopeful and former Pennsylvania senator, says McCain is misguided in his stance against the enhanced interrogation techniques sanctioned during the Bush administration but discontinued by Obama's White House, which has labeled them torture.

“Everything I’ve read shows that we would not have gotten this information as to who this man was if it had not been gotten information from people who were subject to enhanced interrogation,” Santorum said, referring to the courier that led Americans to Osama bin Laden. “And so this idea that we didn’t ask that question while Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was being waterboarded, he doesn’t understand how enhanced interrogation works. I mean, you break somebody, and after they’re broken, they become cooperative.”

With the torture debate reignited by bin Laden's death, McCain has argued that enhanced interrogation did not lead the United States to the terror leader, and that his death should not be used to justify past use of techniques like water boarding. Last week, McCain took to the Washington Post’s op-ed page, saying that techniques like water boarding have no place in American interrogation policies.

In a statement to POLITICO after publication of this article, Santorum emphasized said his comments shouldn't be taken as an insult to McCain's service.

“I disagree with Senator McCain’s view that the enhanced interrogation techniques used on a select few high-value terrorist detainees were unsuccessful nor do I believe they amounted to torture," he said. "For anyone to infer my disagreement with Senator McCain’s policy position lessens my respect for his service to our country and all he had to endure is outrageous and unfortunate.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55140.html

My take on this..While Rick Santorum states he respects John McCain's military service and sacrifice, he certainly has a funny way of showing it. As far as I am concerned there is no one is the US government more qualified to say what is torture and what isn't than John McCain considering what he went through during the Vietnam War. In that war and many others before it (including World War II), water boarding has been used by the enemy against American POWs and as such the US government considered it torture..until recent years when it suddenly became "enhanced interrogation". So this argument as to whether water boarding is torture or not is really no argument at all and simply a casualty of the political battlefield.

The only issue at hand is "does the ends justify the means", as in if these "enhanced interrogation" tactics do sometimes provide valid intelligence (as some suggest it did with the locating and killing of Osama bin Laden) does that justify the tactics? For that question I have no answer..but it is a good one.

2 comments:

  1. I would like to post a book I just read on this subject, that, IMHOP, is more of an authority on the comparative efficacy of means for extracting information from terrorists than either McCain or Santorum: "How to Break a Terrorist: The U.S. Interrogators Who Used Brains, Not Brutality, to Take Down the Deadliest Man in Iraq") by Matthew Alexander and John Bruning.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just from what I have heard of the book, I would agree it sounds like one of the best books on the topic. Thanks for the mention!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Break_a_Terrorist
    http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4377271-how-to-break-a-terrorist

    ReplyDelete